Originally posted by flarendep1
View Post
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
I never wanna hear that this shit isnt fixed ever again !!!!
Collapse
X
-
Three Jack's Record http://www.bettorschat.com/forums/sh...10#post1323910
-
Chado
Originally posted by Chado1 View PostGuys I personally was unaware that this is actually the "7th" tie breaker in sequential order....how can anyone in this thread make that an argument? They had to review for the 7th tiebreaker...OMFG...I just spit up my water...
Guess that makes your previous statement moot....it does make a difference.....
and yes Greek---keep showing that statement----cause it proves it does, and can make a difference....
Don't make me go Cajun on your Ass!
Comment
-
Originally posted by 10DimeBry View Postdont give me tie breaker BS that has no merrit what so ever.Three Jack's Record http://www.bettorschat.com/forums/sh...10#post1323910
Comment
-
Originally posted by flarendep1 View PostYou won the battle but the good guys will win the war.
You must love NBC's Sunday Night Football's halftime "green" show for enviromental awareness. Kieth Olberman must be holding them hostage or something. I say separation of Sports and Politics, whadya say?
Let's not turn this into a political debate thread.....We'll be hung in effigy....
KAZ
Comment
-
the same probability that a tie breaker on points is going to make or break an NFL team for the playoffs are about the same as me doing the following.
banging a pornstar while getting struck by lightning in the ocean while being attacked by a shark.2013 NCAA POD Record
8-3ATS +3.80 units
2013 NFL POD Record
1-2 ATS -4.50 units
Comment
-
Originally posted by 10DimeBry View Postthe same probability that a tie breaker on points is going to make or break an NFL team for the playoffs are about the same as me doing the following.
banging a pornstar while getting struck by lightning in the ocean while being attacked by a shark.MLB (2014): (3-4) -.9 units
Comment
-
Originally posted by Three Jack View PostSorry about your Ravens today, Flare....well, actually, I am not.....
I was not sorry at all, my play of the day was the Giants, I won huge $$$ on it
I will bet against my team when there is $$ to be made. I will take the Ravens at home against the Beagles next week!
Check my call as I nailed it:
http://www.bettorschat.com/forums/al...unday-nfl.htmlNBA is a joke
Comment
-
Originally posted by kaptain View Postwell well mr greek....another brilliant statement from you....
so it was conclusive to the man in the booth... Guess that makes it ok
it just so happens, thats his job, and he has final say so.....damn right that makes it ok.....
Where in the world did you come up with statement.....must've not thought b4 you typed that one....
Damn right it's ok....he determines conclusive, and that's it....
Who are we to question him......maybe you can make the calls for em via internet next time, as you seem to have a handle on it, and you can stop the fixing lmao at that one
who is this man in the booth kapt ?
Can we hear a statement from him about his decision because this since it is such a hot topic ? Or will the nfl not allow that ?
Hmmmmmm
who are we to question him ??
Fans, people that spend money on tix and merchandice , etc
easy to win an arguement when you can say "well the man in the booth made the call and thats his job "
maybe that man in the booth was on the phone with vegas waiting to be told what to do
my theory is just as legit as yours
Comment
-
Originally posted by 10DimeBry View Postthe same probability that a tie breaker on points is going to make or break an NFL team for the playoffs are about the same as me doing the following.
banging a pornstar while getting struck by lightning in the ocean while being attacked by a shark.
Comment
-
Papi
Originally posted by Spark View PostSo then i guess it was not conclusive ...
I watched that tape 5 times and I do not see how you can say that there is conclusive evidence to overturn that call ... and i had SD
kaz I agree with you 100% ... You are right on
PAPI----I watched it several times also....I see the ball somewhere slightly above the 25 from LT, and then slightly above the 26 for receiver.....Tough angle but I see it as forward.......
Besides....what troubles me, is there has to be CONCLUSIVE evidence to overturn a ruling on the field.....Field Ref said TD, man in the booth saw CONCLUSIVE evidence in his eyes to overturn the field call....
Maybe he had a better view or angle than we have....
Anyways, it's his decision to make, it's his that's counts, and that's all I see to it......
It's in the eyes of the beholder.......But to start shouting FIX is ridiculous IMO...It's simply the way he saw it
Don't make me go Cajun on your Ass!
Comment
-
Originally posted by flarendep1 View PostI was not sorry at all, my play of the day was the Giants, I won huge $$$ on it
I will bet against my team when there is $$ to be made. I will take the Ravens at home against the Beagles next week!
Check my call as I nailed it:
http://www.bettorschat.com/forums/al...unday-nfl.htmlThree Jack's Record http://www.bettorschat.com/forums/sh...10#post1323910
Comment
-
Originally posted by kaptain View Postpapi----i watched it several times also....i see the ball somewhere slightly above the 25 from lt, and then slightly above the 26 for receiver.....tough angle but i see it as forward.......
Besides....what troubles me, is there has to be conclusive evidence to overturn a ruling on the field.....field ref said td, man in the booth saw conclusive evidence in his eyes to overturn the field call....
Maybe he had a better view or angle than we have....
Anyways, it's his decision to make, it's his that's counts, and that's all i see to it......
It's in the eyes of the beholder.......but to start shouting fix is ridiculous imo...it's simply the way he saw it
ridiculous to you....
Keep looking at the world in rose colored glasses kapt
Comment
-
Originally posted by DAREALDEAL View PostKapt and a few others saw conclusive evidence
Comment
-
The NFL admitted that Troy Polamalu's fumble return for a touchdown in the waning seconds of Sunday's game against the Chargers should have counted.
This really affected betting because the spread was 3 with the Steelers favored and San Diego would have lost by seven had the touchdown stood. Instead, Pittsburgh won 11-10 due to an officiating mistake. We're guessing that most bets were on the Steelers. The score can no longer be changed.
Source: San Diego Union-Tribune
GUESS THAT SETTLES THAT!Last edited by harold_bush; 11-16-2008, 11:32 PM.
Comment
-
Originally posted by spark View Postgets away with what kapt??? I mentioned it to him and he stopped ... I told him it was uncalled for and asked him to stop and he did ...
I think he realizes that his post was out of line ... Much like your comment to me was ...
Comment
Comment