I never wanna hear that this shit isnt fixed ever again !!!!

[molta02]

Exactly!

yes, EXACTLY! all this debate only helps the fact there wasn't enough to OVERTURN the call on the field.

[molta02]

He DIDN'T rule it a forward pass on the field Kapt. He reviewed it and said that after CONCLUSIVE video evidence, it was a forward pass. No way in hell that was CONCLUSIVE and the ruling on the field should stand. And HIS RULING on the field was a touchdown!!!!!

KAZ

ding ding ding. you are the winner kaz. now claim your prize.

[Chado1]

i've seen it plenty of times. there is no way that was a forward pass, and NO WAY IN HELL was it conclusive enough to overturn a call.

NO SHIT AND THIS IS EVEN LET ALONE THE FACT THAT THEY WERE REVIEWING A PLAY IN WHICH THE WINNER OF THIS GAME WAS ALREADY DETERMINED WITH NO TIME ON CLOCK...

NO POINT GUYS....LET NAIVE FRANK, THREEJACK, AND KAPTAIN THINK WE LIVE IN A PERFECT WORLD WHERE ALL IS SMOOTH, RIGHT, AND JUST....

On a side note all ThreeJacks posts in this thread had me laughing so hard...his gay comments like "Hell, if this and that" blah blah blah...or "PUHLEEZE you guys are"....blah blah...dude doesnt even gamble on sports and thinks things are always done properly...I am like 97% sure he takes it back door when nobody's watching...and especially by the comments he makes and the way he presents himself...couldnt be more gayer IMO...

[Three Jack]

my point is the only thing that mattered in this game was the SPREAD the game was over pitt wins either way 11-10 or 17-10 the spread was 4 thus the refs knew this and had to make a ruling. how can anyone think otherwise??

Dimer, if the refs were on the take, why wouldn't they call it a forward pass on the field during real time? It was close enough that no one would have said a word. If they were on SD, why take the chance and go to a replay? Would think if what you believe was true, they woul dhave looked for any opportunity to call a penalty to end the game on the field.

[Three Jack]

yes, EXACTLY! all this debate only helps the fact there wasn't enough to OVERTURN the call on the field.

Or that there are enough people to think it did go forward. Your glass mus tbe half full....mine is half empty.

[KazDog]

ding ding ding. you are the winner kaz. now claim your prize.

Thanks....I'd like my prize to be a Pittsburgh cover to give me a winning day instead of a losing one....

KAZ

[10DimeBry]

Dimer---are you now saying the refs made up the rule, tie breaker etc, all at the end of the game....

Get real Dimer....these rules, as I stated earlier, are given to each Owner, Each Coach, and generally gone over with each player....

Refs have to attend schools, learn rules, take tests, and be aware of all new rule changes.....

PRE existing rule, tie breakers, all B4 the season started....

Got anything else....that one doesn't fly.....

Go ahead and believe that one play, yeh that one play, was premeditated by the FIX Doctors, on National TV, when in reality if it was fixed, they would have been making lil subtle damaging calls against one team or the other all day....

I'm sure the books paid em a ton of money to have SD cover that spread on the last play as planned...

Give me a break dimer

you dont need sports books. If the spread was 10 or 16 would they have reviewed that play??? SURVEY says........ NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO O

fact is getting the call right or wrong after the fact only occured because they knew the line on the game was 4 and that was in question. so regardless if they got the call correct or not the refs are letting a betting line influence their decisions. THAT my friend is fixing. plane and simple end of discussion

[Spark]

NO SHIT AND THIS IS EVEN LET ALONE THE FACT THAT THEY WERE REVIEWING A PLAY IN WHICH THE WINNER OF THIS GAME WAS ALREADY DETERMINED WITH NO TIME ON CLOCK...

NO POINT GUYS....LET NAIVE FRANK, THREEJACK, AND KAPTAIN THINK WE LIVE IN A PERFECT WORLD WHERE ALL IS SMOOTH, RIGHT, AND JUST....

On a side note all ThreeJacks posts in this thread had me laughing so hard...his gay comments like "Hell, if this and that" blah blah blah...or "PUHLEEZE you guys are"....blah blah...dude doesnt even gamble on sports and thinks things are always done properly...I am like 97% sure he takes it back door when nobody's watching...and especially by the comments he makes and the way he presents himself...couldnt be more gayer IMO...

WOW!!! No need for those comments Chad .... I do not get you sometimes

[Three Jack]

NO SHIT AND THIS IS EVEN LET ALONE THE FACT THAT THEY WERE REVIEWING A PLAY IN WHICH THE WINNER OF THIS GAME WAS ALREADY DETERMINED WITH NO TIME ON CLOCK...

NO POINT GUYS....LET NAIVE FRANK, THREEJACK, AND KAPTAIN THINK WE LIVE IN A PERFECT WORLD WHERE ALL IS SMOOTH, RIGHT, AND JUST....

On a side note all ThreeJacks posts in this thread had me laughing so hard...his gay comments like "Hell, if this and that" blah blah blah...or "PUHLEEZE you guys are"....blah blah...dude doesnt even gamble on sports and thinks things are always done properly...I am like 97% sure he takes it back door when nobody's watching...and especially by the comments he makes and the way he presents himself...couldnt be more gayer IMO...

All I will say is 'you can't shine shit'...you will always be classless and continue to shw it...thank you! As Spark says, give 'em enough rope....

[Three Jack]

WOW!!! No need for those comments Chad .... I do not get you sometimes

thanks Spark.

[KazDog]

Or that there are enough people to think it did go forward. Your glass mus tbe half full....mine is half empty.

The point is Jack....So much debate for or against, means....NOT CONCLUSIVE and the CALL ON THE FIELD STANDS......TOUCHDOWN!

KAZ

[GOLDENGREEK]

i had under in the game, so i dont really care !

BUT, holy shit i just watched the video of the game!

THAT WAS A PITTSBURGH TOUCHDOWN!

WTF!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

I has san diego and the under ...and I thought that was a bullshit call !!

[LVJimmy]

Costas with another mention of it at halftime...HAHA.

[10DimeBry]

Dimer, if the refs were on the take, why wouldn't they call it a forward pass on the field during real time? It was close enough that no one would have said a word. If they were on SD, why take the chance and go to a replay? Would think if what you believe was true, they woul dhave looked for any opportunity to call a penalty to end the game on the field.

because it happend so fast in real time. and they werent sure. and they stuck with TOUCHDOWN on the field fact is those trickery plays arent easy to call. regardless they reviewed it due to fact of the point spread. which = FIX!!!!

[flarendep1]

Chris Collingsworth just said the play should have been called a TD