Tweet
Everyone loves Monday Night Football, and I gotta' tell you after looking at how my 6 All New Formulas did last year on Monday Nights, I wish I had developed them a year sooner on a few of the games!
Some of the Winning Formulas kick in Week Two and by Week Four they're ALL in full swing. Of the 16 possible Monday Night plays, the Winning Formulas gave us a play on 9 Monday Nights--or just over half.
That's about right since the Winning Formulas averaged 8.6 plays per week last year--just over half.
Here's the juicy Monday Night Football results when the Winning Formulas had a selection...
Week Three:
1* BUCS (+3) 26, Rams 14 Win
Week Four:
2* RAVENS (+9) 34, Broncos 23 Win
Week Five:
2* Packers (pk) 34, BEARS 21 Win
Week Eight:
1* Giants (+8) 3, EAGLES 17 Lose
Week Nine:
1* PACKERS (-4) 24, Dolphins 10 Win
Week Ten:
3* Raiders (+6) 34, BRONCOS 10 Win
Week Twelve:
2* Eagles (+7) 38, 49ers 17 Win
Week Fifteen:
1* TITANS (-3) 24, Patriots 7 Win
Week Sixteen:
2* Steelers (+4') 17, BUCS 7 Win
Week Seventeen:
1* RAMS (+3) 31, 49ers 20 Win
Monday Night often has a tendancy to 'amplify' what the play does. Notice that ALL 8 Winners won the game Straght Up and Against the Spread--six of them as dogs.
In fact, all 8 Winners Won and Covered by DOUBLE DIGITS.
***The average "Cover" for the 8 Winners was nearly 3 touchdowns at +19.5 per game average. I don't know about you, but that's got my juices flowing!
I noticed that the "Four Star" Winning Formula games from last year (9-0 ATS) were sizeable covers (I'll be posting all the Winning Formula CONSENSUS games soon). Here's one thing I look at...
Do the Winning Formula picks have a higher Winning percentage if they are rated higher? They SHOULD. It makes sense. They should have a higher Winning percentage against the spread IF there is (as I believe) a cause and effect.
Also, not only is the Winning percentage higher, but as I mentioned, the Higher rated 3-star and 4-star games also seem to have a larger "Cover" than the others. That's a good sign.
To check out more numbers, feel Free to stop by for a visit...
dave
http://www.footballformulas.com
Contact dave: [email protected]
Some of the Winning Formulas kick in Week Two and by Week Four they're ALL in full swing. Of the 16 possible Monday Night plays, the Winning Formulas gave us a play on 9 Monday Nights--or just over half.
That's about right since the Winning Formulas averaged 8.6 plays per week last year--just over half.
Here's the juicy Monday Night Football results when the Winning Formulas had a selection...
Week Three:
1* BUCS (+3) 26, Rams 14 Win
Week Four:
2* RAVENS (+9) 34, Broncos 23 Win
Week Five:
2* Packers (pk) 34, BEARS 21 Win
Week Eight:
1* Giants (+8) 3, EAGLES 17 Lose
Week Nine:
1* PACKERS (-4) 24, Dolphins 10 Win
Week Ten:
3* Raiders (+6) 34, BRONCOS 10 Win
Week Twelve:
2* Eagles (+7) 38, 49ers 17 Win
Week Fifteen:
1* TITANS (-3) 24, Patriots 7 Win
Week Sixteen:
2* Steelers (+4') 17, BUCS 7 Win
Week Seventeen:
1* RAMS (+3) 31, 49ers 20 Win
Monday Night often has a tendancy to 'amplify' what the play does. Notice that ALL 8 Winners won the game Straght Up and Against the Spread--six of them as dogs.
In fact, all 8 Winners Won and Covered by DOUBLE DIGITS.
***The average "Cover" for the 8 Winners was nearly 3 touchdowns at +19.5 per game average. I don't know about you, but that's got my juices flowing!
I noticed that the "Four Star" Winning Formula games from last year (9-0 ATS) were sizeable covers (I'll be posting all the Winning Formula CONSENSUS games soon). Here's one thing I look at...
Do the Winning Formula picks have a higher Winning percentage if they are rated higher? They SHOULD. It makes sense. They should have a higher Winning percentage against the spread IF there is (as I believe) a cause and effect.
Also, not only is the Winning percentage higher, but as I mentioned, the Higher rated 3-star and 4-star games also seem to have a larger "Cover" than the others. That's a good sign.
To check out more numbers, feel Free to stop by for a visit...
davehttp://www.footballformulas.com
Contact dave: [email protected]